I think irrelevance is not making any of your points come together within the conclusion. That makes the definition of relevance in upon "having connection at the matter at hand".
Relevance can be a connection to any argument in life. Just recently, I had an argument about different types of gas. So there's 87, 89, 91, and in some places, 93 in America. I was talking about how turbo cars require 91. Then concluded in how they require 91 gas because the turbo boost pressure makes the cylinders go faster, thus requiring 91 gas because of the boost pressure. Talking about turbo boost pressure makes the premise relevant because it backs up the argument.
Here is valentines day, my car found a really hot date.
Yeah, irrelevant statements can really weaken an argument because sometimes when I go to sleep at night, I hear strange noises outside. It's always like it's some sort of person doing something or saying something. It's like the place is haunted or something. I wonder if anyone else in my dorm ever experiences this because when it happens to me I get this shiver in the back of my neck like someone just put an ice cube there or something. See how I just contradicted myself? Because I proved myself right but if I proved myself right that really means that I proved myself wrong, because I said that my argument would become weaker by using irrelevant statements, by actually using them I weakened my argument thus proving myself right, but this also meant that I was wrong because the irrelevant statements strengthened my argument instead of weakening it. I hope someone understands what I wrote, because I barely do.
ReplyDelete